Roof Shingles Lawsuit

This class action lawsuit claims that iko cambridge ar roof shingles are defective and prone to premature blistering tearing cracking delamination granule loss degradation and loss of adhesion at the seal strip between adjacent shingles.

Roof shingles lawsuit.

District court for the central district of illinois. 2 09 md 02104 in the u s. The new jersey lawsuit. Like most vaccines zostavax is the live form of the virus.

These lawsuits alleged that the adhesive used to attach the organic shingles to roofs was defective which prevented the shingles from sticking properly. Of america asphalt roofing shingle products liability litigation mdl no. Similar to another complaint you will need to remove shingles to send to certainteed to prove they are certainteed shingles along with other documentation. Iko roofing shingle products liability litigation case no.

The total amount of payoff to plaintiffs remains undisclosed. As a result the shingles would become warped or blow off leaving areas of the roof unprotected from the elements and allowing rain or snow to leak into underlying property. The lawsuit was settled on april 22 and 23 2015. This settlement resolves a lawsuit over whether or not organic roofing shingles manufactured by the defendant certainteed corporation from july 1 1987 through 2005 are defective and failed to perform as promised when installed on buildings located in the united states and canada.

Misleading warranty claim i have a 9 year old roof with a 10 year warranty for blue algae problems. You are not eligible if you previously filed a lawsuit about your shingles and the lawsuit was resolved with a final judgment or order whether or not it was in your favor or if you signed a goodwill release after submitting a warranty claim to iko unless the claim was for less than the whole roof and iko made a settlement payment for less. A case alleging that eastern white cedar wood shingles were defective issued its decision denying class certification for. After the gonzalez trial court opinion was issued the new jersey district court in stern et al.

This lawsuit filed in new jersey alleges that nearly 1 000 victims took zostavax vaccine to avoid shingles but instead developed a recurring strain of herpes zoster which is more difficult to treat than usual. The award included either replacement roof shingles comparable to the product installed and or a cash payment.